The Hindu Editorial – 11 jan 2026
Justice Delayed: On victim protection and character assassination
This editorial analysis helps you understand Parts of Speech (Noun, Pronoun, Adjective, Adverb, Preposition, Conjunction), Tenses (Present, Past, Future, Perfect, Continuous), Infinitives, Gerunds, and Participles through practical examples.
New: (Summary: Sentence-by-Sentence Summary (Easy Learning Format) is written just below the editorial, please read each sentence carefully.)
The new criminal laws (Noun – Sub) are said (Main Verb – Present Passive) to be (Main Verb – Present) pro-women (adj) in (Prep) their scope (Noun), but (Conj) the suicide (Noun – Sub) of (Prep) a young lady doctor (Noun) in (Prep) Phaltan (Noun), in (Prep) Satara district (Noun), Maharashtra (Noun), in (Prep) October 2025 (Noun), was (Main Verb – Past) a wake-up call (Noun – Obj) that (Conj) much (Noun – Sub) needs (Main Verb – Present) to be done (Infinitive) still (Adv). The doctor (Noun – Sub) had written (Main Verb – Past Perfect) a note (Noun – Obj) on (Prep) the palm (Noun) of (Prep) her hand (Noun) that (Conj) alleged (Main Verb – Past) rape and harassment (Noun – Obj) by (Prep) a police official (Noun) and (Conj) another man (Noun). Her passing (Noun – Sub) highlights (Main Verb – Present) the first crime (Noun – Obj), which (Conj) is (Main Verb – Present) the failure (Noun) of (Prep) administrative systems (Noun) that ( (Conj) purportedly (Adv) disregarded (Main Verb – Past) her pleas (Noun – Obj) for (Prep) help (Noun). The second crime (Noun – Sub) is derived (Participle) from (Prep) this (Pronoun), which (Conj) is (Main Verb – Present) the public character assassination (Noun) that ( (Conj) follows (Main Verb – Present) when (Conj) a victim’s family (Noun – Sub) begin (Main Verb – Present) their quest (Noun – Obj) for (Prep) justice (Noun). This secondary victimisation (Noun – Sub) by (Prep) society (Noun) was evident (Main Verb – Past) in (Prep) the comments (Noun – Obj) made (Participle) by ( (Prep) the Chairperson (Noun – Sub) of ( (Prep) the Maharashtra State Commission for Women (Noun), who (Pronoun – Sub – Relative), in (Prep) public statements (Noun), had (Main Verb – Past) details (Noun – Obj) about (Prep) the victim’s private communication and relationships (Noun). These comments (Noun – Sub) — often (Adv) viewed (Participle) as ( (Prep) shifting (Gerund) blame and questioning (Gerund) the victim’s behaviour (Noun – Obj) — reveal (Main Verb – Present) how ( (Conj) strongly (Adv) the culture (Noun – Sub) of ( (Prep) questioning ( (Gerund) the victim and behaviour (Noun) persists (Main Verb – Present) even (Adv) among (Prep) those ( (Pronoun) who ( (Pronoun – Sub – Relative) are (Main Verb – Present) committed (Participle) to (Prep) protecting (Gerund) women (Noun). Unless (Conj) India (Noun – Sub) addresses (Main Verb – Present) this ‘second crime’ (Noun – Obj) with (Prep) the same legal and moral seriousness (Noun) as ( (Prep) the original offence (Noun), no amount of legislative changes (Noun – Sub) will lead (Main Verb – Future) to ( (Prep) genuine justice (Noun – Obj). Although (Conj) the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (Noun – Sub), aims (Main Verb – Present) to create (Infinitive) a more women-centric criminal justice system (Noun – Obj), the Phaltan case (Noun – Sub) remains (Main Verb – Present) a stark reminder (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) the challenges (Noun) ahead (Adv). Can (Main Verb) a new criminal law (Noun – Sub) truly (Adv) safeguard (Main Verb) a victim’s dignity (Noun – Obj) when (Conj) the very institution (Noun – Sub) she (Pronoun – Sub) worked for (Main Verb – Past), the State Commission (Noun) responsible (adj) for (Prep) ensuring (Gerund) her rights (Noun – Obj) and (Conj) her dignity (Noun), and ( (Conj) the society (Noun – Sub) that ( (Conj) she (Pronoun – Sub) represents (Main Verb – Present), are (Main Verb – Present) all (Adv) determined (Participle) to damage (Infinitive) her character (Noun – Obj)? Often (Adv), ignorance (Noun – Sub) of ( (Prep) the law (Noun) leads (Main Verb – Present) to ( (Prep) damage (Noun – Obj). The core (Noun – Sub) of ( (Prep) the legal mandate (Noun) to protect (Infinitive) a victim’s dignity (Noun – Obj) lies (Main Verb – Present) in ( (Prep) the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 (Noun), often (Adv) called (Main Verb – Present Passive) the “Nirbhaya Act” (Noun – Obj). These amendments (Noun – Sub) were (Main Verb – Past) legislative acts of conscience (Noun), specifically (Adv) designed (Participle) to dismantle (Infinitive) the very foundation (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) character assassination (Noun) in ( (Prep) rape trials (Noun), often (Adv) used (Participle) in ( (Prep) the public sphere (Noun). Prohibition (Noun) on ( (Prep) character evidence (Noun) Criminal jurisprudence (Noun – Sub) has developed (Main Verb – Present Perfect) to ( (Prep) the extent (Noun) of ( (Prep) making (Gerund) amendments (Noun – Obj) to prevent (Infinitive) the ‘character assassination’ (Noun) of ( (Prep) victims (Noun). The addition (Noun – Sub) of ( (Prep) Section 53A (Noun) of ( (Prep) the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Noun), now (Adv) Section 50 (Noun) of ( (Prep) the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 (Noun), legally (Adv) implies (Main Verb – Present) that ( (Conj) a woman’s personal life (Noun – Sub), her friendships, messages or habits (Noun) cannot be used (Main Verb – Modal Passive) by ( (Prep) the defence (Noun) to argue (Infinitive) that ( (Conj) she (Pronoun – Sub) “deserved it” (Main Verb – Past) or ( (Conj) that ( (Conj) her consent (Noun – Sub) should be presumed (Main Verb – Modal Passive). The amendment (Noun – Sub) to ( (Prep) Section 146, Indian Evidence Act (Section 48 (Noun) of ( (Prep) BSA) (Noun) is (Main Verb – Present) to prohibit (Infinitive) questions (Noun – Obj) being put (Participle) to ( (Prep) a victim (Noun) during (Prep) cross-examination (Noun) regarding (Prep) her “general immoral character or previous sexual experience” (Noun). The focus (Noun – Sub) has (Main Verb – Present) to remain (Infinitive) strictly (Adv) on ( (Prep) the facts (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) the alleged crime (Noun). Thus (Adv), the law (Noun – Sub) has evolved (Main Verb – Present Perfect) and (Conj) even (Adv) when ( (Conj) it (Pronoun – Sub) comes (Main Verb – Present) to ( (Prep) presumption (Noun), there (Adv) have been (Main Verb – Present Perfect) various (adj) amendments (Noun – Sub) to make (Infinitive) the laws (Noun – Obj) more (Adv) women-friendly (adj). Some (Pronoun) of ( (Prep) the key (adj) directives (Noun) The Supreme Court (Noun – Sub) of ( (Prep) India (Noun) has delivered (Main Verb – Present Perfect) a series (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) landmark judgments (Noun) that ( (Conj) unequivocally (Adv) shield (Main Verb – Present) the dignity (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) victims/survivors (Noun) of ( (Prep) sexual violence (Noun). First (Adv), irrelevance (Noun – Sub) of ( (Prep) prior sexual history (Noun). In ( (Prep) The State Of Punjab vs Gurmit Singh & Ors. (1996) (Noun), the Court (Noun – Sub) emphatically (Adv) stated (Main Verb – Past) that ( (Conj) the victim’s testimony (Noun – Sub) should not be viewed (Main Verb – Modal Passive) with suspicion (Prep) simply (Adv) because (Conj) she (Pronoun – Sub) is (Main Verb – Present) a woman (Noun – Obj). It (Pronoun – Sub) warned (Main Verb – Past) against (Prep) dismissing (Gerund) a victim’s evidence (Noun – Obj) based (Participle) on ( (Prep) a perception (Noun) of ( “loose morals” (Noun), stating (Gerund) that ( (Conj) every woman (Noun – Sub), regardless (Prep) of ( (Prep) her character (Noun), has (Main Verb – Present) the right (Noun – Obj) to refuse (Infinitive) sexual intercourse (Noun – Obj). Second (Adv), insult (Noun – Sub) to ( (Prep) injury (Noun). The Court (Noun – Sub) has repeatedly (Adv) observed (Main Verb – Present Perfect), under (Prep) wider (adj) scope (Noun), that ( (Conj) subjecting (Gerund) a victim (Noun – Obj) to ( (Prep) intense (adj) scrutiny (Noun), searching (Gerund) for (Prep) minor (adj) discrepancies (Noun), and ( (Conj) casting (Gerund) aspersions (Noun – Obj) on ( (Prep) her character (Noun) only (Adv) add (Main Verb – Present) “insult to injury” (Noun – Obj) — a clear (adj) condemnation (Noun) of ( (Prep) the very (adj) essence (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) victim-blaming (Noun). In ( (Prep) the Phaltan case (Noun), the victim’s family (Noun – Sub) had (Main Verb – Past) to face (Infinitive) this (Pronoun – Obj). Third (Adv), the ban (Noun – Sub) on ( (Prep) identity disclosure (Section 228A (Noun) of ( (Prep) the Indian Penal Code (Noun), now (Adv) Section 72 (Noun) of ( (Prep) the BNS) (Noun). In ( (Prep) several (adj) judgments (Noun – Sub), including (Participle) comprehensive (adj) directions (Noun – Obj) issued (Participle) in ( (Prep) 2018 (Noun) and ( (Conj) 2019 (Noun), the Court (Noun – Sub) has mandated (Main Verb – Present Perfect) that ( (Conj) no person (Noun – Sub) shall print or publish (Main Verb – Future) the name (Noun – Obj) or ( (Conj) any matter (Noun) that ( (Conj) may make known (Main Verb – Modal) the identity (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) a sexual assault victim (Noun). This blanket (adj) ban (Noun – Sub) extends (Main Verb – Present) even (Adv) to ( (Prep) a deceased (adj) person (Noun) unless (Conj) a competent (adj) authority (Noun – Sub) determines (Main Verb – Present) otherwise (Adv). This legal (adj) provision (Noun – Sub) exists (Main Verb – Present) specifically (Adv) to prevent (Infinitive) the public (adj) shaming and character assassination (Noun – Obj) that ( (Conj) disclosure (Noun – Sub) often (Adv) invites (Main Verb – Present). Subjecting (Gerund) a dying (adj) declaration (Noun – Obj) to ( (Prep) media scrutiny (Noun) was (Main Verb – Past) a gross (adj) violation (Noun – Obj) and ( (Conj) interfered (Main Verb – Past) with ( (Prep) the Commission’s investigation (Noun). It (Pronoun – Sub) raises (Main Verb – Present) questions (Noun – Obj) about ( (Prep) the investigation’s progression (Noun) into ( (Prep) abetment (Noun) to ( (Prep) suicide or murder (Noun). Prima (Adv) facie (Adv), a dying (adj) declaration (Noun – Sub) points (Main Verb – Present) to ( (Prep) abetment (Noun – Obj) to ( (Prep) suicide (Noun). Lawyers (Noun – Sub) for ( (Prep) the complainant (Noun) were (Main Verb – Past) not (Adv) allowed (Participle) to see (Infinitive) the investigation report (Noun – Obj), highlighting (Gerund) the misery (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) the victim’s relatives (Noun) experiencing (Gerund) the trauma (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) the victim’s personal information (Noun) being shared (Participle) in ( (Prep) the media (Noun). The Phaltan case (Noun – Sub) exemplifies (Main Verb – Present) how ( (Conj) institutional commentary (Noun – Sub) may inadvertently (Adv) result (Main Verb – Modal) in ( (Prep) character assassination (Noun – Obj), a practice (Noun) that ( (Conj) is (Main Verb – Present) strictly (Adv) prohibited (Participle) under ( (Prep) criminal law (Noun) within ( (Prep) judicial proceedings (Noun). The comments (Noun – Sub) by ( (Prep) public functionaries (Noun), using (Gerund) details (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) the victim’s personal communication (Noun), are (Main Verb – Present) akin (adj) to ( (Prep) an extra-judicial (adj) function (Noun) of ( (Prep) victim shaming (Noun). They (Pronoun – Sub) create (Main Verb – Present) a public (adj) opinion (Noun – Obj), a “social verdict” (Noun), that ( (Conj) tries (Main Verb – Present) the victim’s character (Noun – Obj), effectively (Adv) achieving (Gerund) the ‘second crime’ (Noun – Obj) that ( (Conj) the 2013 Amendment (Noun – Sub) was designed (Main Verb – Past Passive) to eradicate (Infinitive) from ( (Prep) judicial procedure (Noun). This act (Noun – Sub), while (Conj) not (Adv) technically (Adv) a violation (Noun) of ( (Prep) the ban (Noun) on ( (Prep) identity disclosure (as ( (Conj) the victim’s name (Noun – Sub) was (Main Verb – Past) widely (Adv) known (Participle) ) (Noun), is (Main Verb – Present) a breach (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) the spirit (Noun) of ( (Prep) the judicial directions (Noun): to treat (Infinitive) the victim (Noun – Obj) with (Prep) fairness (Noun), respect (Noun) and ( (Conj) dignity (Noun). It (Pronoun – Sub) is (Main Verb – Present) an institutional (adj) act (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) de facto (adj) character assassination (Noun). The hurdles (Noun), the steps (Noun) to take (Prep) Passing (Gerund) laws (Noun – Sub) alone (Adv) does not guarantee (Main Verb – Present) real (adj) justice (Noun – Obj), as ( (Conj) there (Pronoun – Sub) is (Main Verb – Present) a large (adj) gap (Noun – Obj) between ( (Prep) policy (Noun) and ( (Conj) practice (Noun) that ( (Conj) needs (Main Verb – Present) to be bridged (Participle). The irony (Noun – Sub) is (Main Verb – Present) that ( (Conj) while ( (Conj) the law (Noun – Sub) has moved forward (Main Verb – Present Perfect), the societal (adj) mindset (Noun – Sub) is (Main Verb – Present) still (Adv) rooted (Participle) in ( (Prep) a patriarchal (adj) past (Noun). The Phaltan case (Noun – Sub) exposes (Main Verb – Present) the profound (adj) contradiction (Noun – Obj) between ( (Prep) this strong (adj) judicial (adj) mandate (Noun) and ( (Conj) failed (adj) social (adj) behaviour (Noun). The solution (Noun – Sub) lies (Main Verb – Present) in ( (Prep) championing (Gerund) a bold (adj), women-centric (adj) approach (Noun – Obj) by ( (Prep) focusing (Gerund) on ( (Prep) game-changing (adj) implementation (Noun) strategies (Noun). First (Adv), training and sensitisation (Noun – Sub). The police (Noun), prosecutors (Noun), and ( (Conj) judges (Noun – Sub) must be trained and sensitised (Main Verb – Modal Passive) to understand (Infinitive) and ( (Conj) respond (Main Verb) empathetically (Adv) to ( (Prep) the trauma (Noun – Obj) that ( (Conj) victims (Noun – Sub) endure (Main Verb – Present), especially (Adv) in ( (Prep) sensitive (adj) cases (Noun) that ( (Conj) concern (Main Verb – Present) sexual assault and domestic violence (Noun). Second (Adv), end (Main Verb) victim (adj) blaming (Noun). As ( (Prep) a society (Noun – Sub), we (Pronoun – Sub) need (Main Verb – Present) to stop (Infinitive) being (Gerund) tolerant (adj) of ( (Prep) societal (adj) attitudes (Noun – Obj) that ( (Conj) question (Main Verb – Present) a victim’s character (Noun – Obj). There (Adv) is (Main Verb – Present) also (Adv) a need (Noun – Sub) to transform (Infinitive) the investigation (Noun) culture (Noun) making (Gerund) it (Pronoun – Obj) truly (Adv) victim-friendly (adj). Third (Adv), resource (Noun) boost (Noun). The new (adj) criminal law (Noun – Sub) lays (Main Verb – Present) an emphasis (Noun – Obj) on ( (Prep) forensic and digital evidence (Noun), but ( (Conj) there (Pronoun – Sub) is (Main Verb – Present) a lack (Noun – Obj) of ( (Prep) infrastructure (Noun). It (Pronoun – Sub) is (Main Verb – Present) time (Noun – Sub) to expand (Infinitive) laboratories (Noun – Obj), invest (Main Verb) in ( (Prep) advanced (adj) forensic (adj) facilities (Noun), have (Main Verb) dedicated (adj) women’s desks (Noun), and ( (Conj) ensure (Main Verb) accessible (adj) legal (adj) aid (Noun – Obj). This (Pronoun – Sub) will make (Main Verb – Future) safeguards (Noun – Obj) such as ( (Prep) audio-visual (adj) statements and clear victim communication (Noun) the standard (adj) tools (Noun) of ( (Prep) justice (Noun). When (Conj) a woman (Noun – Sub) in ( (Prep) a position (Noun) of ( (Prep) authority (Noun), whether (Conj) constitutional (adj), political (adj), or ( (Conj) judicial (adj), chooses (Main Verb – Present) to engage (Infinitive) in ( (Prep) the character assassination (Noun) of ( (Prep) a female (adj) victim (Noun), it (Pronoun – Sub) represents (Main Verb – Present) ultimate (adj) moral (adj) failure (Noun – Obj). It (Pronoun – Sub) is (Main Verb – Present) a lack (Noun – Sub) of ( (Prep) responsibility (Noun) and ( (Conj) a catastrophic (adj) betrayal (Noun) of ( (Prep) solidarity (Noun). The moment (Noun – Sub) has arrived (Main Verb – Present Perfect) for ( (Prep) women (Noun) in ( (Prep) power (Noun) to truly (Adv) grasp (Infinitive) the constitutional (adj) morality (Noun – Obj) that ( (Conj) underpins (Main Verb – Present) their roles (Noun – Obj) and ( (Conj) responsibilities (Noun). Our society (Noun – Sub) yearns (Main Verb – Present) for ( (Prep) women (Noun) who ( (Pronoun – Sub – Relative) champion (Main Verb – Present) equity (Noun – Obj), going (Participle) beyond (Prep) mere (adj) representation (Noun), to inspire (Infinitive) meaningful (adj) change (Noun – Obj). Together (Adv), we (Pronoun – Sub) can transform (Main Verb – Modal) legal (adj) reforms (Noun – Obj) into (Prep) powerful (adj) actions (Noun) that ( (Conj) uplift (Main Verb – Present) and ( (Conj) safeguard (Main Verb – Present) victims (Noun – Obj), ensuring (Gerund) that ( (Conj) society (Noun – Sub) cannot (Main Verb – Modal) afford (Main Verb) to fail (Infinitive).
Sentence-by-Sentence Summary (Easy Learning Format)
Each sentence from the article is presented below with its simple summary in brackets for easy understanding:
- The new criminal laws are said to be pro-women in their scope, but the suicide of a young lady doctor in Phaltan, Satara district, Maharashtra, in October 2025 was a wake-up call that much needs to be done still (Summary: Despite new laws claiming to protect women, a recent tragic case reveals systemic failures.)
- The doctor had written a note on the palm of her hand that alleged rape and harassment by a police official and another man (Summary: Before dying, the victim documented her allegations on her palm.)
- Her passing highlights the first crime, which is the failure of administrative systems that purportedly disregarded her pleas for help (Summary: The tragedy exposes how authorities ignored her requests for assistance.)
- The second crime is derived from this, which is the public character assassination that follows when a victim’s family begin their quest for justice (Summary: Seeking justice often subjects victims to damaging public scrutiny.)
- This secondary victimisation by society was evident in the comments made by the Chairperson of the Maharashtra State Commission for Women, who, in public statements, had details about the victim’s private communication and relationships (Summary: Even women’s rights institutions contribute to victim-blaming through inappropriate public statements.)
- These comments — often viewed as shifting blame and questioning the victim’s behaviour — reveal how strongly the culture of questioning the victim and behaviour persists even among those who are committed to protecting women (Summary: Victim-blaming persists even among supposed protectors.)
- Unless India addresses this ‘second crime’ with the same legal and moral seriousness as the original offence, no amount of legislative changes will lead to genuine justice (Summary: Without addressing character assassination, legal reforms alone cannot deliver justice.)
- Although the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 aims to create a more women-centric criminal justice system, the Phaltan case remains a stark reminder of the challenges ahead (Summary: New laws aim to help women, but implementation challenges remain significant.)
- Can a new criminal law truly safeguard a victim’s dignity when the very institution she worked for, the State Commission responsible for ensuring her rights and her dignity, and the society that she represents are all determined to damage her character? (Summary: Institutions meant to protect women sometimes undermine their dignity instead.)
- Often, ignorance of the law leads to damage (Summary: Lack of legal awareness causes harm to victims.)
- The core of the legal mandate to protect a victim’s dignity lies in the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, often called the “Nirbhaya Act” (Summary: The 2013 Nirbhaya Act forms the foundation of victim protection laws.)
- These amendments were legislative acts of conscience, specifically designed to dismantle the very foundation of character assassination in rape trials, often used in the public sphere (Summary: The 2013 laws were meant to prevent victim character attacks in court proceedings.)
- Prohibition on character evidence — Criminal jurisprudence has developed to the extent of making amendments to prevent the ‘character assassination’ of victims (Summary: Laws now prohibit using a victim’s character as evidence.)
- The addition of Section 53A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, now Section 50 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023, legally implies that a woman’s personal life, her friendships, messages or habits cannot be used by the defence to argue that she “deserved it” or that her consent should be presumed (Summary: New evidence laws prevent defense from misusing a victim’s personal information to blame her.)
- The amendment to Section 146, Indian Evidence Act (Section 48 of BSA) is to prohibit questions being put to a victim during cross-examination regarding her “general immoral character or previous sexual experience” (Summary: Courts cannot ask victims about their sexual history or morality during cross-examination.)
- The focus has to remain strictly on the facts of the alleged crime (Summary: Legal proceedings must focus only on the crime, not the victim’s character.)
- Thus, the law has evolved and even when it comes to presumption, there have been various amendments to make the laws more women-friendly (Summary: Laws have progressively improved to better protect women.)
- First, irrelevance of prior sexual history — The Supreme Court of India has delivered a series of landmark judgments that unequivocally shield the dignity of victims/survivors of sexual violence (Summary: Courts have established that victims’ sexual history is irrelevant to their cases.)
- In The State Of Punjab vs Gurmit Singh & Ors. (1996), the Court emphatically stated that the victim’s testimony should not be viewed with suspicion simply because she is a woman (Summary: The Supreme Court ruled that victim testimony should not be doubted just because the victim is female.)
- It warned against dismissing a victim’s evidence based on a perception of “loose morals,” stating that every woman, regardless of her character, has the right to refuse sexual intercourse (Summary: A woman’s moral character does not affect her right to refuse sex.)
- Second, insult to injury — The Court has repeatedly observed, under wider scope, that subjecting a victim to intense scrutiny, searching for minor discrepancies, and casting aspersions on her character only add “insult to injury” — a clear condemnation of the very essence of victim-blaming (Summary: Courts condemn the practice of scrutinizing victims for flaws.)
- In the Phaltan case, the victim’s family had to face this (Summary: The Phaltan family experienced this harmful scrutiny.)
- Third, the ban on identity disclosure (Section 228A of the Indian Penal Code, now Section 72 of the BNS) — In several judgments, including comprehensive directions issued in 2018 and 2019, the Court has mandated that no person shall print or publish the name or any matter that may make known the identity of a sexual assault victim (Summary: Laws prohibit publishing victims’ identities to protect them from shame.)
- This blanket ban extends even to a deceased person unless a competent authority determines otherwise (Summary: Victim privacy protections apply even after death.)
- This legal provision exists specifically to prevent the public shaming and character assassination that disclosure often invites (Summary: Privacy laws prevent the public character attacks that follow victim identification.)
- Subjecting a dying declaration to media scrutiny was a gross violation and interfered with the Commission’s investigation (Summary: Sharing the victim’s dying declaration with media violated the law and hampered investigation.)
- It raises questions about the investigation’s progression into abetment to suicide or murder (Summary: The case may involve charges of encouraging suicide.)
- Prima facie, a dying declaration points to abetment to suicide (Summary: The evidence suggests someone may have helped cause her death.)
- Lawyers for the complainant were not allowed to see the investigation report, highlighting the misery of the victim’s relatives experiencing the trauma of the victim’s personal information being shared in the media (Summary: The family suffered additional trauma from media leaks of private information.)
- The Phaltan case exemplifies how institutional commentary may inadvertently result in character assassination, a practice that is strictly prohibited under criminal law within judicial proceedings (Summary: Official statements can damage victims, even when not legally prohibited.)
- The comments by public functionaries, using details of the victim’s personal communication, are akin to an extra-judicial function of victim shaming (Summary: Public officials sharing victim details acts like an unofficial character attack.)
- They create a public opinion, a “social verdict,” that tries the victim’s character, effectively achieving the ‘second crime’ that the 2013 Amendment was designed to eradicate from judicial procedure (Summary: Public commentary creates a damaging social judgment of the victim.)
- This act, while not technically a violation of the ban on identity disclosure (as the victim’s name was widely known), is a breach of the spirit of the judicial directions: to treat the victim with fairness, respect and dignity (Summary: Though not illegal, the comments violated the spirit of victim protection.)
- It is an institutional act of de facto character assassination (Summary: Official actions amounted to character destruction.)
- The hurdles, the steps to take — Passing laws alone does not guarantee real justice, as there is a large gap between policy and practice that needs to be bridged (Summary: Laws alone don’t ensure justice—implementation matters.)
- The irony is that while the law has moved forward, the societal mindset is still rooted in a patriarchal past (Summary: Laws have modernized but social attitudes haven’t.)
- The Phaltan case exposes the profound contradiction between this strong judicial mandate and failed social behaviour (Summary: There’s a gap between legal protections and actual treatment of victims.)
- The solution lies in championing a bold, women-centric approach by focusing on game-changing implementation strategies (Summary: Better implementation of women-focused policies is needed.)
- First, training and sensitisation — The police, prosecutors, and judges must be trained and sensitised to understand and respond empathetically to the trauma that victims endure, especially in sensitive cases that concern sexual assault and domestic violence (Summary: Legal officials need training on victim trauma.)
- Second, end victim blaming — As a society, we need to stop being tolerant of societal attitudes that question a victim’s character (Summary: Society must reject victim-blaming attitudes.)
- There is also a need to transform the investigation culture making it truly victim-friendly (Summary: Investigations must become more supportive of victims.)
- Third, resource boost — The new criminal law lays an emphasis on forensic and digital evidence, but there is a lack of infrastructure (Summary: New laws require forensic evidence but facilities are insufficient.)
- It is time to expand laboratories, invest in advanced forensic facilities, have dedicated women’s desks, and ensure accessible legal aid (Summary: Investment in legal infrastructure and victim support services is needed.)
- This will make safeguards such as audio-visual statements and clear victim communication the standard tools of justice (Summary: Better systems will ensure proper victim support becomes routine.)
- When a woman in a position of authority—whether constitutional, political, or judicial—chooses to engage in the character assassination of a female victim, it represents ultimate moral failure (Summary: Women in power who attack victims fail morally.)
- It is a lack of responsibility and a catastrophic betrayal of solidarity (Summary: Such actions betray women’s solidarity and show irresponsibility.)
- The moment has arrived for women in power to truly grasp the constitutional morality that underpins their roles and responsibilities (Summary: Women leaders must understand the ethical principles of their positions.)
- Our society yearns for women who champion equity, going beyond mere representation, to inspire meaningful change (Summary: Society needs women leaders who promote genuine equality.)
- Together, we can transform legal reforms into powerful actions that uplift and safeguard victims, ensuring that society cannot afford to fail (Summary: Collective effort can turn legal reforms into effective victim protection.)
Vocabulary with Meanings and Synonyms
- Pro-women – Favorable to women or promoting women’s rights (महिला-समर्थक)
Synonyms: Women-friendly, pro-female, supportive of women - Wake-up call – Something that makes people realize a problem (जागरूक करने वाला संदेश)
Synonyms: Alert, warning, reality check - Administrative systems – Government or organizational management structures (प्रशासनिक व्यवस्था)
Synonyms: Management framework, bureaucratic structure - Purportedly – According to what is claimed (दावे के अनुसार)
Synonyms: Allegedly, supposedly, apparently - Character assassination – Deliberate damage to someone’s reputation (चरित्र हत्या)
Synonyms: Reputation destruction, smear campaign - Secondary victimisation – Further harm to victims after the initial crime (द्वितीयक शिकारीकरण)
Synonyms: Secondary harm, repeated victimization - Shifting blame – Transferring responsibility to someone else (दोष निरूपण)
Synonyms: Deflecting responsibility, scapegoating - Questioning the victim – Doubting or challenging the victim’s credibility (पीड़ित पर संदेह)
Synonyms: Victim-blaming, doubting testimony - Legislative changes – Modifications to laws (विधायी परिवर्तन)
Synonyms: Law amendments, statutory changes - Women-centric – Focused on women’s needs and rights (महिला-केंद्रित)
Synonyms: Female-focused, woman-oriented - Stark reminder – Clear and unmistakable warning (स्पष्ट अनुस्मरण)
Synonyms: Clear warning, obvious lesson - Safeguard – To protect or secure (सुरक्षित करना)
Synonyms: Protect, defend, secure, preserve - Determined – Firmly decided or resolved (दृढ़संकल्पित)
Synonyms: Resolute, firm, steadfast, decided - Ignorance – Lack of knowledge or awareness (अज्ञानता)
Synonyms: Unawareness, lack of knowledge, uninformed state - Legal mandate – Official requirement or authorization (कानूनी आदेश)
Synonyms: Legal requirement, statutory obligation - Dismantle – To take apart or destroy systematically (तोड़ डालना)
Synonyms: Destroy, eliminate, demolish, break down - Foundation – The basic structure or underlying support (आधार / नींव)
Synonyms: Base, groundwork, underlying structure - Public sphere – The area of social life where citizens engage in discourse (सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र)
Synonyms: Public domain, civic space - Criminal jurisprudence – The study and application of criminal law (आपराधिक न्यायशास्त्र)
Synonyms: Criminal law, penal jurisprudence - Legally implies – Has as a logical consequence in law (कानूनी रूप से दर्शाता है)
Synonyms: Legally means, legally suggests - Cross-examination – Questioning by opposing counsel (प्रतिपरीक्षा)
Synonyms: Interrogation, questioning by opponent - Presumption – Something assumed without proof (अनुमान)
Synonyms: Assumption, supposition, inference - Landmark judgments – Important court decisions that set precedents (ऐतिहासिक निर्णय)
Synonyms: Precedent-setting cases, significant rulings - Unequivocally – Clearly and definitely (स्पष्ट रूप से)
Synonyms: Clearly, definitely, unmistakably, plainly - Shield – To protect from harm (सुरक्षा प्रदान करना)
Synonyms: Protect, defend, guard, shelter - Emphatically – With great emphasis or force (दृढ़ता से)
Synonyms: Strongly, firmly, decidedly, forcefully - Dismissing – Rejecting or disregarding (खारिज करना)
Synonyms: Rejecting, disregarding, brushing off - Perception – The way something is understood or interpreted (धारणा)
Synonyms: View, understanding, interpretation, viewpoint - Loose morals – Lacking in moral standards (ढीले नैतिक मानदंड)
Synonyms: Questionable character, immoral behavior - Refuse – To decline or reject (मना करना)
Synonyms: Decline, reject, turn down, say no - Insult to injury – Making a bad situation worse (चोट पर नमक छिड़कना)
Synonyms: Making things worse, adding to harm - Intense scrutiny – Very close examination (गहन जांच)
Synonyms: Close examination, thorough inspection - Minor discrepancies – Small differences or inconsistencies (छोटी असंगतियां)
Synonyms: Small differences, minor inconsistencies - Casting aspersions – Making damaging remarks (दोषारोपण करना)
Synonyms: Making accusations, casting blame - Condemnation – Strong disapproval or criticism (निंदा)
Synonyms: Strong criticism, disapproval, denunciation - Essence – The most important part or quality (सार / मूल तत्व)
Synonyms: Core, fundamental part, heart, substance - Victim-blaming – Holding the victim responsible (पीड़ित दोषारोपण)
Synonyms: Blaming the victim, holding victim responsible - Blanket ban – Complete prohibition on something (पूर्ण प्रतिबंध)
Synonyms: Complete prohibition, total ban - Competent authority – Someone with legal power to decide (सक्षम प्राधिकारी)
Synonyms: Official body, authorized person - Gross violation – Serious breach or infringement (गंभीर उल्लंघन)
Synonyms: Serious breach, major infringement - Interfered – Obstructed or got involved inappropriately (हस्तक्षेप किया)
Synonyms: Obstructed, meddled, intruded, intervened - Progression – Development or forward movement (प्रगति / विकास)
Synonyms: Development, advancement, forward movement - Abetment – Helping or encouraging someone to commit a crime (दोष में सहायक)
Synonyms: Aiding, assisting, facilitating crime - Prima facie – On the face of it; at first sight (प्रथम दृष्टि से)
Synonyms: At first sight, seemingly, apparently - Complainant – Person who makes a formal complaint (शिकायतकर्ता)
Synonyms: Plaintiff, person who files complaint - Highlighted – Emphasized or drew attention to (हाइलाइट किया)
Synonyms: Emphasized, drew attention to, pointed out - Misery – Great suffering or distress (दुख-दर्द)
Synonyms: Suffering, anguish, distress, hardship - Experiencing – Undergoing or feeling (अनुभव करना)
Synonyms: Undergoing, feeling, going through - Trauma – Severe emotional distress (मनोवैज्ञानिक आघात)
Synonyms: Emotional distress, psychological injury - Exemplifies – Shows by giving an example (उदाहरण देता है)
Synonyms: Illustrates, demonstrates, shows by example - Inadvertently – By accident; without intention (अनजाने में)
Synonyms: Accidentally, unintentionally, by mistake - Institutional commentary – Statements or analysis from institutions (संस्थागत टिप्पणी)
Synonyms: Official statements, institutional remarks - Akin – Similar to; like (समान / जैसा)
Synonyms: Similar to, like, resembling - Extra-judicial – Outside the court system (न्यायालय से बाहर)
Synonyms: Outside court, non-judicial, informal - Public functionaries – People holding public office (सार्वजनिक अधिकारी)
Synonyms: Public officials, government officials - Personal communication – Private messages or correspondence (निजी संचार)
Synonyms: Private messages, personal correspondence - Social verdict – Public opinion or judgment (सामाजिक निर्णय)
Synonyms: Public opinion, social judgment - Effectively – In a way that produces the intended result (प्रभावी रूप से)
Synonyms: Efficiently, successfully, competently - Achieving – Successfully accomplishing (प्राप्त करना)
Synonyms: Accomplishing, attaining, realizing - Eradicate – To completely destroy or eliminate (मूल से नष्ट करना)
Synonyms: Eliminate, destroy, eliminate completely - Judicial procedure – Court processes and methods (न्यायिक प्रक्रिया)
Synonyms: Court procedure, legal process - Technically – According to the exact rules (तकनीकी रूप से)
Synonyms: Formally, strictly speaking, precisely - Spirit – The essential meaning or intention (भावना / आत्मा)
Synonyms: Essence, meaning, intention, core - Judicial directions – Court orders or instructions (न्यायिक निर्देश)
Synonyms: Court orders, judicial instructions - De facto – In actual practice, though not officially (वास्तव में)
Synonyms: In practice, actually, in reality - Implementation strategies – Plans for putting into effect (कार्यान्वयन रणनीतियां)
Synonyms: Execution plans, rollout strategies - Training and sensitisation – Education and awareness programs (प्रशिक्षण और संवेदनशीलता)
Synonyms: Education and awareness, skill development - Empathetically – With understanding and sympathy (सहानुभूति से)
Synonyms: With understanding, sympathetically, compassionately - End victim blaming – Stop holding victims responsible (पीड़ित दोषारोपण समाप्त करना)
Synonyms: Stop blaming victims, eliminate victim responsibility - Tolerant – Accepting of different views (सहनशील)
Synonyms: Accepting, permissive, open-minded - Societal attitudes – Community perspectives and beliefs (सामाजिक दृष्टिकोण)
Synonyms: Social perspectives, community beliefs - Invest – To put money or effort into something (निवेश करना)
Synonyms: Put money into, fund, finance - Advanced facilities – Modern and sophisticated equipment (उन्नत सुविधाएं)
Synonyms: Modern equipment, sophisticated tools - Dedicated – Specially assigned or reserved (समर्पित)
Synonyms: Assigned, reserved, allocated, devoted - Accessible – Easy to reach or use (सुलभ)
Synonyms: Available, reachable, easy to use - Audio-visual statements – Recorded testimonies with sound and pictures (दृश्य-श्रव्य कथन)
Synonyms: Recorded testimonies, multimedia statements - Standard tools – Regular methods or instruments (मानक उपकरण)
Synonyms: Regular methods, usual instruments - Ultimate – Final; most important (अंतिम / सर्वोच्च)
Synonyms: Final, highest, most important, extreme - Moral failure – Shortcoming in ethics or principles (नैतिक असफलता)
Synonyms: Ethical failure, moral shortcoming - Catastrophic – Extremely bad or serious (तबाहीकारक)
Synonyms: Devastating, disastrous, ruinous, terrible - Betrayal – Act of breaking trust or faith (विश्वासघात)
Synonyms: Treachery, faithlessness, breaking trust - Solidarity – Unity and support among people (एकजुटता)
Synonyms: Unity, fellowship, mutual support - Constitutional morality – Ethical principles based on constitution (संवैधानिक नैतिकता)
Synonyms: Constitutional ethics, legal morality - Underpins – Supports or strengthens from below (आधार बनना)
Synonyms: Supports, strengthens, underlies, forms basis - Yearns – Has a strong desire for (तीव्र इच्छा रखना)
Synonyms: Longs for, craves, desires strongly - Champion – To support or fight for (समर्थन करना)
Synonyms: Support, advocate, fight for, promote - Equity – Fairness and justice (न्यायसंगतता)
Synonyms: Fairness, justice, impartiality, equality - Mere – Only; nothing more than (केवल)
Synonyms: Only, simply, purely, just - Representation – Acting as a representative (प्रतिनिधित्व)
Synonyms: Acting as agent, being spokesperson - Inspire – To motivate or encourage (प्रेरणा देना)
Synonyms: Motivate, encourage, spur, stimulate - Meaningful – Significant or important (अर्थपूर्ण)
Synonyms: Significant, important, worthwhile, substantial - Uplift – To raise up or improve (उन्नत करना)
Synonyms: Raise, improve, elevate, enhance
Read this The Hindu editorial in Hindi
नए आपराधिक कानूनों को महिलाओं के हित में बताया जा रहा है, लेकिन अक्टूबर 2025 में
महाराष्ट्र के सतारा जिले के फलटन में एक युवती डॉक्टर की आत्महत्या ने यह चेतावनी दी कि अभी भी बहुत कुछ किया जाना बाकी है। डॉक्टर ने अपनी हथेली पर एक नोट लिखा था जिसमें उन्होंने एक पुलिस अधिकारी और एक अन्य व्यक्ति द्वारा बलात्कार और उत्पीड़न का आरोप लगाया था।
उनकी मृत्यु पहले अपराध को उजागर करती है, जो प्रशासनिक प्रणालियों की विफलता है जिन्होंने कथित तौर पर उनकी मदद की गुहार को अनसुना कर दिया। दूसरा अपराध इसी से उत्पन्न होता है, जो सार्वजनिक चरित्र हनन है जो तब होता है जब पीड़ित का परिवार न्याय की लड़ाई शुरू करता है।
समाज द्वारा की जाने वाली इस द्वितीयक उत्पीड़न की घटना महाराष्ट्र राज्य महिला आयोग की अध्यक्ष की टिप्पणियों में स्पष्ट रूप से दिखाई देती है, जिन्होंने सार्वजनिक बयानों में पीड़िता के निजी संचार और संबंधों के बारे में जानकारी दी थी। ये टिप्पणियाँ – जिन्हें अक्सर दोष दूसरों पर डालने और पीड़िता के व्यवहार पर सवाल उठाने के रूप में देखा जाता है – यह दर्शाती हैं कि महिलाओं की सुरक्षा के लिए प्रतिबद्ध लोगों के बीच भी पीड़िता और उसके व्यवहार पर सवाल उठाने की संस्कृति कितनी प्रबल है।
जब तक भारत इस ‘द्वितीय अपराध’ को मूल अपराध के समान ही कानूनी और नैतिक गंभीरता से नहीं लेता, तब तक किसी भी प्रकार के विधायी परिवर्तन से वास्तविक न्याय नहीं मिल पाएगा। यद्यपि भारतीय न्याय संहिता (बीएनएस), 2023 का उद्देश्य अधिक महिला-केंद्रित आपराधिक न्याय प्रणाली बनाना है, फिर भी फलटन मामला आने वाली चुनौतियों की स्पष्ट याद दिलाता है।
क्या कोई नया आपराधिक कानून वास्तव में पीड़ित की गरिमा की रक्षा कर सकता है, जब वह संस्था जिसके लिए उसने काम किया, वह राज्य आयोग जो उसके अधिकारों और गरिमा को सुनिश्चित करने के लिए जिम्मेदार है, और वह समाज जिसका वह प्रतिनिधित्व करती है, सभी उसके चरित्र को नुकसान पहुंचाने पर तुले हुए हैं?
अक्सर, कानून की अज्ञानता नुकसान का कारण बनती है।
पीड़ित की गरिमा की रक्षा करने का कानूनी दायित्व मूल रूप से आपराधिक कानून (संशोधन) अधिनियम, 2013 में निहित है, जिसे अक्सर “निर्भया अधिनियम” कहा जाता है। ये संशोधन विवेकपूर्ण विधायी कार्य थे, जिन्हें विशेष रूप से बलात्कार के मुकदमों में चरित्र हनन की बुनियाद को ही खत्म करने के लिए बनाया गया था, जिसका अक्सर सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र में इस्तेमाल किया जाता है।
चरित्र साक्ष्य पर प्रतिबंध
आपराधिक न्यायशास्त्र का इतना विकास हो चुका है कि पीड़ितों के चरित्र हनन को रोकने के लिए संशोधन किए गए हैं। भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 1872 की धारा 53ए (अब भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 2023 की धारा 50) के जुड़ने से कानूनी रूप से यह स्पष्ट हो गया है कि किसी महिला के निजी जीवन, उसके दोस्तों, संदेशों या आदतों का इस्तेमाल बचाव पक्ष द्वारा यह तर्क देने के लिए नहीं किया जा सकता कि वह इसके लिए “योग्य थी” या उसकी सहमति मान ली जानी चाहिए।
भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 146 (बीएसए की धारा 48) में संशोधन का उद्देश्य जिरह के दौरान पीड़िता से उसके “सामान्य अनैतिक चरित्र या पूर्व यौन अनुभव” से संबंधित प्रश्न पूछने पर रोक लगाना है। सारा ध्यान कथित अपराध के तथ्यों पर ही केंद्रित रहना चाहिए। इस प्रकार, कानून में बदलाव आया है और यहां तक कि अनुमान के मामले में भी, कानूनों को महिलाओं के अनुकूल बनाने के लिए कई संशोधन किए गए हैं।
कुछ प्रमुख निर्देश
भारत के सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने यौन हिंसा के पीड़ितों/उत्तरजीवियों की गरिमा की रक्षा करने वाले कई ऐतिहासिक फैसले दिए हैं। पहला, पूर्व यौन इतिहास का महत्वहीन होना। पंजाब राज्य बनाम गुरमीत सिंह एवं अन्य (1996) मामले में न्यायालय ने स्पष्ट रूप से कहा कि पीड़िता की गवाही को केवल इसलिए संदेह की दृष्टि से नहीं देखा जाना चाहिए क्योंकि वह एक महिला है। न्यायालय ने “चरित्रहीन” होने की धारणा के आधार पर पीड़िता के साक्ष्य को खारिज करने के खिलाफ चेतावनी दी और कहा कि प्रत्येक महिला, चाहे उसका चरित्र कैसा भी हो, यौन संबंध से इनकार करने का अधिकार रखती है।
दूसरा, जले पर नमक छिड़कना। न्यायालय ने व्यापक संदर्भ में बार-बार यह टिप्पणी की है कि पीड़ित की गहन जांच-पड़ताल करना, छोटी-छोटी कमियों को खोजना और उसके चरित्र पर लांछन लगाना केवल “जले पर नमक छिड़कने” जैसा है – जो पीड़ित को ही दोषी ठहराने के मूल सिद्धांत की स्पष्ट निंदा है। फलटन मामले में पीड़ित परिवार को इसी का सामना करना पड़ा।
तीसरा, पहचान उजागर करने पर प्रतिबंध (भारतीय दंड संहिता की धारा 228ए, अब बीएनएस की धारा 72)। 2018 और 2019 में जारी किए गए व्यापक निर्देशों सहित कई निर्णयों में, न्यायालय ने आदेश दिया है कि कोई भी व्यक्ति यौन उत्पीड़न पीड़िता का नाम या ऐसी कोई भी जानकारी मुद्रित या प्रकाशित नहीं करेगा जिससे उसकी पहचान उजागर हो सके। यह व्यापक प्रतिबंध मृतक व्यक्ति पर भी लागू होता है, जब तक कि कोई सक्षम प्राधिकारी अन्यथा निर्णय न दे। यह कानूनी प्रावधान विशेष रूप से सार्वजनिक बदनामी और चरित्र हनन को रोकने के लिए बनाया गया है, जो अक्सर खुलासे से होता है। मृत्यु पूर्व बयान को मीडिया की जांच के दायरे में लाना एक गंभीर उल्लंघन था और आयोग की जांच में बाधा उत्पन्न करता था। इससे आत्महत्या या हत्या के लिए उकसाने की जांच की दिशा पर सवाल उठते हैं। प्रथम दृष्टया, मृत्यु पूर्व बयान आत्महत्या के लिए उकसाने की ओर इशारा करता है। शिकायतकर्ता के वकीलों को जांच रिपोर्ट देखने की अनुमति नहीं दी गई, जिससे पीड़िता के परिजनों की पीड़ा उजागर होती है, जो पीड़िता की निजी जानकारी मीडिया में साझा किए जाने के सदमे से जूझ रहे हैं।
फाल्टन मामला इस बात का उदाहरण है कि कैसे संस्थागत टिप्पणी अनजाने में चरित्र हनन का कारण बन सकती है, एक ऐसा अभ्यास जो न्यायिक कार्यवाही के भीतर आपराधिक कानून के तहत सख्ती से निषिद्ध है।
सार्वजनिक अधिकारियों द्वारा पीड़ित के निजी संचार के विवरणों का उपयोग करते हुए की गई टिप्पणियाँ, पीड़ित को शर्मिंदा करने के एक गैर-न्यायिक कार्य के समान हैं। वे एक जनमत, एक “सामाजिक निर्णय” का निर्माण करती हैं, जो पीड़ित के चरित्र की परीक्षा लेता है, और प्रभावी रूप से उस ‘दूसरे अपराध’ को अंजाम देता है जिसे 2013 के संशोधन द्वारा न्यायिक प्रक्रिया से समाप्त करने के लिए बनाया गया था।
यह कृत्य, यद्यपि तकनीकी रूप से पहचान उजागर करने पर प्रतिबंध का उल्लंघन नहीं है (क्योंकि पीड़ित का नाम सर्वविदित था), फिर भी न्यायिक निर्देशों की भावना का उल्लंघन है: पीड़ित के साथ निष्पक्षता, सम्मान और गरिमा के साथ व्यवहार करना। यह संस्थागत रूप से चरित्र हनन का कृत्य है।
बाधाएँ, उठाए जाने वाले कदम
केवल कानून बनाने से ही वास्तविक न्याय की गारंटी नहीं मिलती, क्योंकि नीति और व्यवहार के बीच एक बड़ा अंतर है जिसे पाटना आवश्यक है। विडंबना यह है कि कानून में प्रगति तो हुई है, लेकिन सामाजिक मानसिकता अभी भी पितृसत्तात्मक अतीत में ही अटकी हुई है। फल्टन मामला इस सशक्त न्यायिक जनादेश और विफल सामाजिक व्यवहार के बीच गहरे विरोधाभास को उजागर करता है।
इसका समाधान एक साहसिक, महिला-केंद्रित दृष्टिकोण को बढ़ावा देने में निहित है, जिसके लिए परिवर्तनकारी कार्यान्वयन रणनीतियों पर ध्यान केंद्रित करना होगा।
सर्वप्रथम, प्रशिक्षण और संवेदनशीलता। पुलिस, अभियोजकों और न्यायाधीशों को प्रशिक्षित और संवेदनशील बनाया जाना चाहिए ताकि वे पीड़ितों द्वारा सहन किए जाने वाले आघात को समझ सकें और सहानुभूतिपूर्वक प्रतिक्रिया दे सकें, विशेषकर यौन उत्पीड़न और घरेलू हिंसा से संबंधित संवेदनशील मामलों में।
दूसरा, पीड़ित को दोष देना बंद करें। एक समाज के रूप में, हमें उन सामाजिक दृष्टिकोणों के प्रति सहनशीलता छोड़नी होगी जो पीड़ित के चरित्र पर सवाल उठाते हैं। साथ ही, जांच संस्कृति को भी बदलने की आवश्यकता है ताकि यह वास्तव में पीड़ित-हितैषी हो।
तीसरा, संसाधनों में वृद्धि। नया आपराधिक कानून फोरेंसिक और डिजिटल साक्ष्यों पर जोर देता है, लेकिन बुनियादी ढांचे की कमी है। प्रयोगशालाओं का विस्तार करने, उन्नत फोरेंसिक सुविधाओं में निवेश करने, महिलाओं के लिए समर्पित डेस्क स्थापित करने और सुलभ कानूनी सहायता सुनिश्चित करने का समय आ गया है। इससे ऑडियो-विजुअल बयान और पीड़ित के साथ स्पष्ट संवाद जैसे सुरक्षा उपाय न्याय के मानक उपकरण बन जाएंगे।
जब संवैधानिक, राजनीतिक या न्यायिक किसी भी पद पर आसीन कोई महिला किसी महिला पीड़ित के चरित्र हनन में संलग्न होती है, तो यह नैतिक विफलता का चरम उदाहरण है। यह उत्तरदायित्व का अभाव और एकजुटता का घोर विश्वासघात है।
सत्ता में विराजमान महिलाओं के लिए अब वह समय आ गया है जब वे संवैधानिक नैतिकता को सही मायने में समझें जो उनकी भूमिकाओं और जिम्मेदारियों का आधार है। हमारा समाज ऐसी महिलाओं की तलाश में है जो समानता की पैरवी करें, मात्र प्रतिनिधित्व से आगे बढ़कर सार्थक बदलाव लाएं। साथ मिलकर, हम कानूनी सुधारों को ऐसे सशक्त कार्यों में बदल सकते हैं जो पीड़ितों का उत्थान और सुरक्षा करें, और यह सुनिश्चित करें कि समाज इस मामले में विफल न हो।
Source: The Hindu Newspaper – Link
The Hindu Vocabulary Daily Quiz – Attempt now
the hindu editorial, the hindu editorial today, the hindu editorial analysis, the hindu editorial english, the hindu editorial for competitive exams, the hindu editorial for ssc, the hindu editorial for bank exams, the hindu editorial for nda cds, the hindu editorial for upsc, the hindu editorial grammar, the hindu editorial vocabulary, the hindu editorial explained, the hindu editorial question answer, the hindu editorial reading practice, the hindu editorial daily analysis the hindu editorial

today the hindu editorial analysis, the hindu editorial in hindi,
the hindu editorial analysis in hindi, The Hindu Editorial Analysis, The Hindu Editorial Summary, The Hindu Editorial Notes, The Hindu Editorial 2026, The Hindu Editorial Vocabulary, The Hindu Editorial Meaning, The Hindu Editorial Explanation, The Hindu Editorial Important Points, SSC English Editorial, Bank English Editorial, UPSC Editorial Analysis, NDA CDS English Editorial, Competitive Exam Editorial, Current Affairs Editorial, Editorial Comprehension, Editorial Practice for Exams, Vocabulary from Editorial, Synonyms from Editorial, Antonyms from Editorial, Idioms & Phrases in Editorial, Words for SSC Bank UPSC Exams, Editorial Grammar Analysis, Editorial Word Meaning, English Reading Practice, Editorial Notes PDF, Editorial for Competitive Exams, The Hindu Editorial English, English Comprehension Practice, The Hindu Editorial Analysis with Meaning, The Hindu Editorial Vocabulary for SSC Bank, Daily The Hindu Editorial Summary, Editorial Analysis for UPSC NDA CDS Exam, Important Words from The Hindu Editorial
Leave a comment